Skip to main content
Last reviewed: Next review due: Reflects current California Bond of Qualifying Individual requirements
2026 Requirements Verified
BPC § 7071.910% ownership test

Do You Even Owe a Second $25,000 Bond?

Short answer: if you’re an RME, yes — always. If you’re an RMO, Responsible Managing Manager, or Responsible Managing Member and you own 10% or more of the corporation’s voting stock or the LLC’s membership interest, no — you file a CSLB exemption certificate instead. That single percentage, defined in Business and Professions Code § 7071.9, decides whether you buy a $25,000 Bond of Qualifying Individual (BQI) or skip it entirely. Most competitor pages sell this bond to everyone who lands on the page — we check your exemption status first.

This is the exact-match page for the qualifying individual bond specifically. For the standard $25,000 entity license bond every CSLB licensee carries, see the CSLB license bond page. For the full California contractor bonding picture — license bond, LLC bond, disciplinary bond, and this one — start at the California contractor license bond hub.

$25,000
Bond, if required
10%
Ownership exempts RMO/RMM
$0
Exemption path cost
$7,500
Non-priority claim cap

The § 7071.9 Exemption Decision Tree

Three questions, in order, determine your answer. Work through them before you request a quote — you may not need one.

1. Are you the sole proprietor, a general partner, or a joint licensee on this license?

Yes

Stop here. BPC § 7071.9 does not apply to you at all — you are already personally on the license, not standing in as a qualifier. You only owe the standard $25,000 license bond under BPC § 7071.6.

No

You’re qualifying the license as an RMO, RME, Responsible Managing Manager, or Responsible Managing Member. Continue to question 2.

2. Are you an RME (a bona fide employee, with no ownership stake)?

Yes

Stop here. The § 7071.9 exemption is only available to owners. As an RME you have no ownership stake to certify, so the $25,000 BQI is required — no exception, regardless of tenure or experience.

No

You’re an RMO, Responsible Managing Manager, or Responsible Managing Member with an equity stake. Continue to question 3.

3. Do you own 10% or more of the corporation’s voting stock (or the LLC’s membership interest)?

Yes

You’re exempt. File CSLB’s Bond of Qualifying Individual exemption certificate instead of buying the bond — no premium, no underwriting.

No

You owe the $25,000 Bond of Qualifying Individual. Use the form above — we already know your role, so we skip straight to underwriting.

Federally recognized tribes: BPC § 7071.9(a)(2) exempts qualifying individuals of federally recognized and participating tribes from this bonding requirement outright, independent of the ownership test above.

What BPC § 7071.9 Actually Requires

The statute in plain terms, with the exact figures CSLB enforces.

Official California Requirements

"If the qualifying individual...is neither the proprietor, a general partner, nor a joint licensee, the qualifying individual shall file or have on file a qualifying individual's bond...in the sum of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000)."
California Business and Professions CodeBusiness and Professions Code § 7071.9
Who must file the BQI
Any RME qualifying a corporation, LLC, or partnership license
Any RMO who owns less than 10% of the corporation’s voting stock
Responsible Managing Manager/Member of an LLC owning less than 10% of membership interest
Every additional qualifier if more than one RME/RMO qualifies the same license
Who is exempt
Sole proprietors, general partners, and joint licensees (excluded from the definition entirely)
RMOs owning 10%+ of voting stock (file exemption certificate)
RMM/RMMembers owning 10%+ of LLC membership interest (file exemption certificate)
Qualifying individuals of federally recognized and participating tribes

Like the entity license bond, § 7071.9 caps the aggregate amount available to non-priority claimants at $7,500 per bond, reserving the balance for specified higher-priority beneficiary classes.

SB 607 doubled the BQI from $12,500 to $25,000 the same day it raised the entity license bond from $15,000 to $25,000 — both changes are in the same bill, but they are two separate bond amounts under two separate statutes.

RMO vs. RME: Same Legal Duty, Different Bonding Fate

CSLB uses the operational titles RMO, RME, Responsible Managing Manager, and Responsible Managing Member. The statute governing all four uses one term: “qualifying person.”

Official California Requirements

"The person qualifying on behalf of an individual or firm...shall be responsible for exercising supervision and control of their employer's or principal's construction operations."
California Business and Professions CodeBusiness and Professions Code § 7068.1
RMO — Responsible Managing Officer

A corporate officer of record on the CSLB license, exercising the same § 7068.1 supervision-and-control duty as any qualifying person. The distinction that matters for bonding is equity: an RMO who holds an officer title but no stock is treated the same as an RME for BQI purposes.

Owns 10%+ voting stock → exemption certificate, no bond.

Owns under 10% (or 0%) → $25,000 BQI required.

RME — Responsible Managing Employee

A bona fide employee actively engaged in the business for at least 32 hours, or 80% of the business’s weekly operating hours, whichever is less, per 16 CCR § 823(a) and BPC § 7068(c). The RME exercises the identical §7068.1 supervision duty as an RMO — the only difference is the RME holds no equity in the license they qualify.

No ownership path exists for an RME — the $25,000 BQI is required for as long as they hold the role.

The three-firm limit (§ 7068.1)

A single qualifying person — RMO or RME — may not act as the qualifier for more than three licensed firms in any calendar year, with exceptions where the firms share common ownership of at least 20% equity, are subsidiaries or joint ventures of each other, or share the same majority ownership among their partners, officers, or managers. This limit compounds directly with the BQI: an RME qualifying three unrelated firms is very likely carrying three separate Bonds of Qualifying Individual at the same time.

The Real Cost Stack: License Bond Alone vs. License Bond + BQI

If you don’t qualify for the exemption, budget for two $25,000 bonds, not one. Pricing below is typical market premium, not a statutory rate.

LLC + non-exempt qualifier — the worst case

An LLC qualified by an RME stacks all three bonds: $25K license bond + $25K BQI + $100K LLC employee/worker bond = $150,000 in total bonding on one license.

Read the $100,000 LLC Employee/Worker Bond page →

Already carrying the standard $25K bond?

If you haven’t filed the entity’s license bond yet, start there first — CSLB won’t activate a license on the BQI alone.

Read the $25,000 CSLB License Bond page →

Multi-License Qualifiers: When One Person Bonds Several Firms

Estimators, project executives, and licensing consultants who qualify multiple contractor entities face a compounding bond count — not a bulk discount.

One qualifier, one license
The baseline case covered throughout this page: one BQI, tied to your role and ownership on that single license.
Multiple qualifiers, one license
CSLB requires that if a license has more than one RME or RMO qualifying it, each qualifier independently meets the bonding requirement — one qualifier being exempt at 10%+ ownership doesn’t exempt a co-qualifying RME on the same license.
One qualifier, several firms
Capped at three firms per year under § 7068.1 (absent the common-ownership exceptions). Each firm is a separate license file, and your BQI status is evaluated against your role and ownership on that firm specifically.

Practical read: a licensing consultant who RME-qualifies three small specialty contractors this year — none of which they own equity in — is managing three separate $25,000 BQI relationships simultaneously, on top of the three-firm ceiling in § 7068.1. If that describes your situation, tell us all three business names in the form above and we’ll quote them together rather than three separate intake calls.

Confirmed you owe the bond? Skip straight to underwriting.

Get My BQI Bond Quote

Qualifying Individual Bond FAQs: Exemptions, Stacking, and Multi-License Qualifiers

The questions RMOs, RMEs, and their licensing consultants actually ask.

I already bought the $25,000 CSLB license bond. Why would I need a second $25,000 bond?
They are two different bonds guaranteeing two different people. The license bond under BPC § 7071.6 is filed by the license itself (the entity) and protects consumers and the CSLB against the business as a whole. The Bond of Qualifying Individual under BPC § 7071.9 is filed by the specific person qualifying the license — the RMO or RME — and exists because that individual, not just the entity, is the one legally responsible for supervising the work. A corporation with an RME qualifier carries both: the entity’s $25,000 license bond and the qualifier’s $25,000 BQI, for $50,000 in total bonding on a single license. If the qualifier is a sole proprietor, general partner, or joint licensee, this second bond does not apply at all — see the decision tree above.
I'm a 12% LLC member and I'm also the qualifying manager. Do I need the BQI?
No. Under BPC § 7071.9, a Responsible Managing Manager or Responsible Managing Member of an LLC who owns at least 10% of the membership interest is exempt from the Bond of Qualifying Individual. You certify the ownership stake to CSLB on its exemption certificate instead of purchasing a bond. The exemption is tied to the percentage, not the title — a 9% member with the exact same manager title still owes the $25,000 bond. If your ownership stake changes after you certify, the exemption is no longer supported and CSLB can require the bond going forward, so re-file if your equity moves.
I'm an RME with 15 years of experience but zero equity. Can I ever get out of this bond?
No, and this is the detail that trips up experienced RMEs the most. The § 7071.9 exemption is available only to a Responsible Managing Officer of a corporation or a Responsible Managing Manager/Member of an LLC who owns 10% or more of the entity. An RME is, by CSLB's own definition, a bona fide employee — someone who does not hold an ownership stake in the license they qualify. There is no tenure-based, experience-based, or performance-based path around the requirement. Every RME who qualifies a California license carries the $25,000 BQI for as long as they hold that role, full stop.
I qualify three different licenses as an RME. Do I need three separate BQIs?
CSLB is explicit that when a license has more than one RME or RMO qualifying it, each qualifier must independently meet the qualifier bonding requirement — and the inverse is also true in practice: a qualifier who is the RME of record on multiple licenses is on the hook for the BQI condition on each license file separately, since the bond attaches to your qualifying role on that specific license, not to you as a person across the state. Before you get to three, though, check BPC § 7068.1 — it caps a single qualifier at acting as the qualifying person for no more than three licensed firms in any calendar year, with narrow exceptions for firms under common ownership of at least 20% equity, subsidiaries, joint ventures, or firms with the same majority ownership among partners, officers, or managers. If you are qualifying three unrelated firms, you are already at the statutory ceiling.
Does the $25,000 BQI actually pay out $25,000 per claim?
No — like the license bond, BPC § 7071.9 caps the aggregate amount available to non-priority claimants at $7,500 per bond, with the statute reserving the remaining balance for specified higher-priority beneficiary classes. The $25,000 is the face amount CSLB requires on file, not a guaranteed $25,000 payout to every claimant. This is the same claim-priority structure as the entity’s license bond, just applied to the qualifying individual’s separate bond.
I'm a sole proprietor. Do I need to worry about this bond at all?
No. BPC § 7071.9 only applies to a "qualifying individual" — CSLB’s term for an RMO, RME, Responsible Managing Manager, or Responsible Managing Member who qualifies a license on behalf of someone else’s business. If you are the sole proprietor, a general partner, or a joint licensee, the statute excludes you from the definition outright, because you are already personally and directly on the license — not standing in as a qualifier for a separate legal entity. You still owe the standard $25,000 license bond under BPC § 7071.6, but never the second Bond of Qualifying Individual.

Official CSLB Resources

Statutes

Bond of Qualifying Individual: BPC § 7071.9 (leginfo.ca.gov)

Qualifying Person Duties: BPC § 7068.1 (leginfo.ca.gov)

Entity License Bond: BPC § 7071.6 (leginfo.ca.gov)

CSLB contact & forms

Bond Requirements page: cslb.ca.gov/bond_requirements

CSLB phone: (800) 321-2752

Exemption certificates are requested directly through CSLB and are not something our agency files on your behalf — we can confirm eligibility, but the certification is between you and the Board.

Eric Drummond, Licensed Surety Producer
Reviewed by
Eric Drummond, Licensed Surety Producer

All content is researched from official state and federal sources (.gov) and verified before publication. BuySuretyBonds.com works with Treasury-certified, A-minimum rated surety carriers serving all 50 states.

Know Your Status. Then Move Fast.

If you’re exempt, we’ll tell you before you pay for anything. If you owe the $25,000 BQI, same-day issuance for normal credit — BPC § 7071.9 compliant.

Treasury-listed carriers • A- minimum AM Best rating • BPC § 7071.9 compliant