Nevada Probate Bond
Whether you need a Nevada probate bond depends first on which of three estate-value tracks your case falls into — set-aside (≤ $150,000), summary administration ($150,000–$500,000), or general administration (over $500,000) — and second on a discretionary court test under NRS 142.020 that applies the same way regardless of which track you're on. There's no fixed statewide bond amount to quote, because Nevada courts can waive bond outright or accept a blocked account under NRS 142.020(3) in its place. That flexibility is the whole story here — and it's exactly what most bond guides skip.
Estates under $150,000 often never reach a bond question at all — no personal representative gets appointed. Estates above that line do get a PR, and from there the real fight is bond vs. blocked account, not which multiplier applies.
Three estate-value tracks, and only two of them involve a bond conversation
Nevada sorts every estate by value before it ever gets to bond. Which track you land in determines whether a personal representative is even appointed — and a bond can't attach to a role nobody holds.
Nevada estate administration tracks by value
NRS 146.070 (set-aside), NRS 145.040 (summary), general administration (NRS 136.090/139.090)
Set-Aside Without Administration
Net value ≤ $150,000
No personal representative appointed in most cases — the estate is set apart directly to a surviving spouse or minor children.
- NRS 146.070 — net value = fair market value of probate assets minus mortgages and liens (unsecured debt is not subtracted)
- Court MUST grant it under §146.070(3) if the estate is ≤ $150,000 and there's a surviving spouse or minor child
- No PR appointment usually means no NRS 142.020 bond question ever comes up
Summary Administration
$150,000 – $500,000
A personal representative is appointed and most standard notices are dispensed with — but bond is decided exactly like any other case.
- NRS 145.040 — gross estate, after deducting encumbrances, must not exceed $500,000
- Court grants it only "if it deems advisable" — not automatic even under the threshold
- NRS 142.020 bond discretion applies unchanged; summary status shortens paperwork, not the bond analysis
General Administration
Over $500,000
Full probate — every standard notice, publication, and accounting requirement applies, and bond discretion runs the same NRS 142.020 test.
- Petition for probate of will and issuance of letters under NRS 136.090/139.090
- 90-day creditor claim window (vs. 60 days in summary administration) under NRS 147.040
- Estate must close within 18 months absent litigation, a will contest, or a pending DHHS claim — NRS 143.037
Nevada Revised Statutes §§ 146.070, 145.040, 136.090, 139.090 — Nevada State Legislature. Dollar thresholds verified against the Eighth Judicial District Court (Clark County) Office of the Probate Commissioners' Synopsis of Nevada Probate Law, rev. 10/1/2025.
There's an even smaller track most bond guides never mention: the Affidavit of Entitlement under NRS 146.080(7), for estates worth $25,000 or less ($150,000 if the claimant is the surviving spouse) with no Nevada real property. It skips court appointment entirely — no personal representative, no letters, no bond, just a sworn affidavit to whoever is holding the asset. If your Nevada estate is genuinely small and liquid, this is worth ruling out before you assume you need set-aside administration at all.
What actually changes between the three tracks
Summary administration is often described as the "lighter" track, but the only thing it lightens is notice and publication burden — not the bond analysis.
Nevada set-aside vs. summary vs. general administration
Procedural requirements by estate-value track
| Set-Aside | Summary Administration | General Administration | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Governing statute | NRS 146.070 | NRS 145.040 | NRS 136.090 / 139.090 |
| Threshold | Net value ≤ $150,000 | Gross value (less encumbrances) ≤ $500,000 | Over $500,000, or summary revoked under §145.110 |
| Personal representative appointed? | Usually no | Yes | Yes |
| Notice of initial petition | Yes — 10 days, no newspaper publication (§146.070(11)) | Yes — mailed + 3x newspaper publication (§145.030) | Yes — mailed + 3x newspaper publication (§155.020) |
| Creditor claim window | N/A — no administration | 60 days (§147.040) | 90 days (§147.040) |
| Inventory required? | Not filed the same way — estimate goes in the petition | Yes (§144.010 — one of the notices §145.010 does not waive) | Yes (§144.010) |
| NRS 142.020 bond discretion applies? | Rarely reached — no PR in most cases | Yes, identical standard | Yes, identical standard |
NRS §§ 136.090, 139.090, 144.010, 145.010, 145.030, 145.040, 146.070, 147.040, 155.020. Creditor claim windows and inventory rules verified against the Eighth Judicial District Court Synopsis of Nevada Probate Law, rev. 10/1/2025.
How NRS 142.020's discretionary bond actually gets decided
Most states give the executor a will-waiver escape hatch and call it done. Nevada doesn't build its bond rule around the will at all — NRS 142.020(1) opens with "the requirement of a bond of a personal representative is discretionary with the court" and applies that discretion whether a bond is expressly required by the will or not. The court has exactly two paths: require a bond if it's desirable, or dispense with it if it's unnecessary — or if the estate's assets are deposited in a blocked account.
Official Nevada Requirements
"The requirement of a bond of a personal representative is discretionary with the court. Whether a bond is expressly required by the will or not, the court may: (a) Require a bond if it determines a bond is desirable; or (b) Dispense with the requirement of a bond if: (1) The court determines a bond is unnecessary; or (2) The assets of the estate are deposited with a financial institution pursuant to subsection 3."Nevada State Legislature — Nevada Revised Statutes • NRS 142.020(1)
Subsection 3 is where the blocked account gets teeth: the personal representative deposits the estate's personal assets with a domestic credit union or bank on terms the court sets, the deposit stays "subject to the further order of the court," and no money moves without a court-authorized withdrawal. The personal representative then files the institution's signed acknowledgment — a form the statute itself titles "PROOF OF BLOCKED ACCOUNT" — with the clerk. The Eighth Judicial District Court's Office of the Probate Commissioners describes exactly this outcome as standard Clark County practice: when a will is silent on bond, or there's no will at all, liquid assets held in an attorney's IOLTA account or a blocked account routinely satisfy the court without a commercial surety bond layered on top. Washoe County's Second Judicial District runs the identical NRS 142.020(3) mechanism — it's a statutory tool available statewide, not a Clark County accommodation, though Clark is the county that has published the clearest guidance on how the hearing actually goes.
One more subsection worth knowing before you assume bond is settled at appointment: NRS 142.020(4) lets any interested person — including a creditor — petition mid-administration for additional bond, as long as the estate's value exceeds $10,000. The clerk sets it for hearing, and the court can order bond in the amount of the petitioner's claim. A personal representative who cleared the appointment hearing without a bond, or with a modest one, isn't necessarily done with the question.
When the court does require a bond, here's the formula
NRS 142.020(5) sets a default amount that applies unless the will names a different figure, the court changes it, or a creditor's additional-bond petition under subsection 4 forces a different number.
Nevada Personal Representative Bond Default (NRS 142.020(5))
NRS 142.020(5) — Nevada Revised Statutes, Nevada State Legislature. Real estate value itself doesn't enter the formula directly the way it does under some other states' probate codes — only the income real and personal property are expected to generate does.
Notice what's missing from that formula: real estate's underlying value. Nevada counts the income real property is expected to throw off over the year, not its sale value — a detail that surprises fiduciaries coming from states that fold net real-estate equity straight into the bond estimate. Compare that to Arizona's A.R.S. § 14-3604 formula, which does count real estate value net of encumbrances, or run your own numbers against every state's approach in the probate bond cost by state guide.
Guardian and special administrator bonds run different statutes
NRS 142.020 only governs a decedent's-estate personal representative. Two related Nevada fiduciary roles get bonded under completely different sections.
Guardian / conservator — NRS 159.065
The court sets the bond at whatever it determines necessary to protect the ward's estate — no personal-property-plus-income formula. The clerk has to approve the bond before it's effective, and multiple sureties are jointly and severally liable with the guardian and each other. Joint guardians can file one combined bond or separate ones.
Special administrator — NRS 140.020 / 140.030
Appointed under NRS 140.020 for gaps — a delay in granting letters, an insufficient bond already on file, or an emergency need to preserve estate assets, and can be appointed without notice or on whatever notice the court deems reasonable. NRS 140.030 then sets the bond before letters can issue: the court sets it "in such sum as the court directs," or waives it outright "with or without conditions," or dispenses with it and requires a blocked account instead — the same three-way discretion NRS 142.020 gives for a regular personal representative, run under its own separate statute for this emergency role.
Handling a time-sensitive gap in a Nevada estate before a full personal representative is appointed? See the special administrator bond guide for how the emergency appointment and its bond waiver actually work, or the conservatorship bond guide and guardianship bond guide for how other states size the NRS 159.065-equivalent role.
Nevada's closing clock keeps running whether or not you're bonded
Bond status doesn't pause the file. NRS 143.035 requires the personal representative to use reasonable diligence closing the estate — within 6 months of appointment if no estate tax return is required, or 18 months if one is. NRS 143.037 backstops that with a hard rule: absent pending litigation, a will contest, or a pending DHHS claim for summary determination, every Nevada estate must close within 18 months of the personal representative's appointment.
Confirm which track your estate falls into
Net value for set-aside (§146.070), gross value less encumbrances for summary (§145.040), or general administration above $500,000 — this decides whether a PR and a bond question exist at all.
Decide bond vs. blocked account before the hearing
If a PR is being appointed, come to the Clark (Eighth JD) or Washoe (Second JD) hearing with a position — a commercial surety bond, or a blocked-account arrangement under NRS 142.020(3) with your bank or credit union already lined up.
If bond is required, build your NRS 142.020(5) estimate
Personal property value plus one year's expected income from real and personal property — we help you build a defensible number before the court sets it.
We underwrite as your commercial surety
Licensed to write Nevada probate and fiduciary bonds statewide, with same-day quotes on most estates.
Watch the closing clock
File within the 6/18-month diligence window under §143.035, and be ready for an NRS 142.020(4) additional-bond petition if a creditor challenges the estate's value mid-case.
Know your estate's rough value and which county you're filing in? We'll tell you whether bond is even likely and get you a same-day quote either way.
Start my Nevada probate bond quoteClark & Washoe County filings
Filed on the form the Eighth and Second Judicial District Courts accept
Bond or blocked-account guidance
We tell you honestly if a blocked account fits better than a bond
Treasury-certified carriers
Same-day quotes for most estate, guardianship, and special administrator bonds
Related Nevada and probate bonds
Nevada fiduciaries often need more than the probate bond itself:
What Nevada fiduciaries ask about this bond
Why doesn't Nevada just publish one probate bond amount like other states?
Because NRS 142.020(1) makes the bond itself discretionary, not the amount. The statute gives the court exactly two moves: require a bond "if it determines a bond is desirable," or dispense with it entirely if the court finds it unnecessary — or if the estate's liquid assets go into a blocked account under subsection 3 instead. There's no statewide default bond a Nevada page can quote the way a state with a fixed multiplier can, because the requirement itself is a case-by-case judicial call before you ever reach an amount. When the court does require one, NRS 142.020(5) sets the default formula: the estimated value of all personal property plus one year's income from both real and personal property — unless the will names a different figure, the court changes it, or a creditor petition under subsection 4 forces a different number.
Can I really skip the bond entirely with a blocked account in Clark County?
Yes — and it's common enough that Nevada put the exact form into the statute itself. NRS 142.020(3) lets the estate's personal assets sit in a domestic credit union or bank account on terms the court sets, "subject to the further order of the court," with money coming out only on a court-authorized withdrawal. The personal representative files the financial institution's signed acknowledgment — captioned "PROOF OF BLOCKED ACCOUNT" — with the clerk, and under subsection 1(b)(2) that filing is an independent basis for the court to dispense with bond, separate from the general "bond is unnecessary" finding. The Eighth Judicial District Court's Office of the Probate Commissioners describes this as standard practice in Clark County estates where the will is silent on bond or there's no will at all: if the liquid assets go into an attorney's IOLTA account or a blocked account, the court typically doesn't require bond on top of it. Washoe County's Second Judicial District runs the identical statutory mechanism — it's a state-code tool, not a Clark-only accommodation, though Clark is the county that's published the clearest practice guidance on how it plays out at hearing.
My mother's estate looks like it's worth about $380,000 — does that put me in summary administration with a smaller bond?
It puts you in summary administration, but that doesn't automatically mean a smaller bond — it means a shorter process. NRS 145.040 lets the court grant summary administration whenever the gross estate, after deducting encumbrances, doesn't exceed $500,000. Once summary administration is granted, NRS 145.010 waives most further notices except the ones tied to NRS 144.010 (inventory), 145.060 (the 60-day creditor claim window), 145.070 (real property sale confirmation), and 145.075 (the final account) — and the notice of the initial petition itself, required under NRS 145.030/155.020, already had to happen before the court could grant summary status in the first place, so it was never a candidate for waiver. None of that touches the bond question — NRS 142.020's discretionary standard applies exactly the same way inside summary administration as it does in general administration. A $380,000 estate can still draw a bond requirement if the court finds one desirable, and can still avoid one entirely through a blocked account. Summary administration shortens your paperwork; it doesn't change the bond math.
What happens if the estate turns out to be worth more than $500,000 after I've already started summary administration?
You have to go back to court and unwind it. NRS 145.110 requires the personal representative to petition to revoke the summary administration order the moment it's discovered — at any point in the case — that the gross estate value at the date of death, after deducting encumbrances, actually exceeded $500,000. The estate then converts to general administration, and because the creditor-claim window is shorter under summary administration (60 days under NRS 145.060/147.040) than under general administration (90 days), the personal representative also has to republish the notice to creditors for an additional 30 days if the original publication only ran the 60-day summary period. A bond that wasn't required — or was sized off the smaller estimate — can also get revisited once the case moves onto the general-administration track, since the underlying value driving the NRS 142.020(5) formula just changed.
Can a creditor force me to post a bigger bond after I've already been appointed personal representative?
Yes, and it doesn't require alleging misconduct. NRS 142.020(4) lets any person with an interest in an estate worth more than $10,000 — including a creditor — file a petition at any time during administration asking the court to order additional bond. The clerk sets it for hearing, the petitioner gives notice under NRS 155.010, and at the hearing the court can order the personal representative to post additional bond in the amount of the petitioner's claim, unless the court decides bond should stay dispensed with or be set at a different figure. It's a live mechanism, not a one-time filing-day decision — a personal representative who was never bonded, or was bonded at a modest figure, can still face a bond petition mid-administration if a creditor thinks their claim is at risk.
Is a Nevada guardian or conservator bond the same thing as a probate bond?
Related, but governed by a different statute with its own mechanics. A personal representative's bond in a decedent's estate runs under NRS 142.020 — the discretionary standard and the personal-property-plus-income formula described above. A guardian of the estate for a minor or protected adult is bonded under NRS 159.065 instead: the court sets the amount it determines necessary to protect the ward's estate, the bond has to be approved by the clerk before it's effective, and multiple sureties on the bond are jointly and severally liable with the guardian and each other. Joint guardians can file one combined bond or separate ones. Nevada exempts a banking corporation or trust company serving as personal representative from bond under NRS 142.020(6) unless the court specifically orders one — guardianship bonds carry a comparable institutional consideration under NRS 159. If you're serving in both roles for the same family (common when a surviving spouse needs both an estate administered and a minor child's inheritance protected), expect two separate bond conversations, not one.
All content is researched from official state and federal sources (.gov) and verified before publication. BuySuretyBonds.com works with Treasury-certified, A-minimum rated surety carriers serving all 50 states.
General information, not legal, tax, or underwriting advice. Nevada probate bond requirements, estate administration thresholds, and exemptions are set by statute (NRS §§ 136.090, 139.090, 140.020, 142.020, 142.030, 143.035, 143.037, 144.010, 145.010, 145.030, 145.040, 145.060, 145.110, 146.070, 146.080, 147.040, 155.020, 159.065) and by each judicial district's local practice, and they change over time. Confirm the current requirement with the district court handling your matter — and with Nevada probate counsel on appointment, blocked-account, and bond questions — before relying on this page, then request a quote for your specific bond form and amount.
Bond or blocked account — we'll tell you which fits
Tell us your county, your role, and your best estimate of the estate's value. We'll walk you through whether NRS 142.020 discretion is likely to land on a bond in your case, write it as your licensed commercial surety if it does, and get it filed — free quote, no obligation.
Quote my Nevada probate bond